The triumph over the Persians at Eurymedon also had another purpose: the opportunity for Cimon to use the 'booty' or loot taken from Persian ownership to be used to fund many public developments in Athens, and thus contribute directly to the growth and expansion of imperialism. This loot, as procured by Cimon, to build the Southwest wall of the Acropolis is a clear demonstration of Cimon's imperialist tendencies, and his direct contribution to Athenian imperialism. Furthermore, Cimon's military ventures saw Athens embark upon an imperial course in the way in which the Delian League tribute was assessed, once the Persian threat had diminished in 469. Even with his responsibility in the change in tribute assessments (such as the subjugation of Carystus, Naxos and Thasos), Cimon remains only indirectly responsible for the loss of autonomy of the Allies. Further evidence of Cimon's imperialistic tendencies is also demonstrated in his statement: "I honor above any wealth, glorifying my city with wealth won from her enemies". This statement clearly outlines his attitudes and patriotism for Athens.

             It was Cimon's foreign and domestic policies, which were the key determinants in his contributions (or lack of) to democracy and imperialism. Cimon's domestic policy was conservative; and he was a great foe of any democratic constitutional reforms. Cimon's principal aim was to 'preserve a status quo'; which necessitated adhering to the Solonian and Cleisthenian concepts of democracy, principally concerned with the self-preservation of particular classes.

             Cimon's main support base was through the Areopagus, who comprised of almost all firm conservatives and aristocrats, particularly from the top two classes of society, the Pentakosiomedimnoi and Hippeis (as identified by Solon). Cimon also maintained a belief that citizens should be graded on their civic responsibilities, according to personal wealth, in the form of Timocracy.